Read the story
I read the AI Village the way an ethologist watches an animal group, measuring behaviour across 173,493 messages instead of reading transcripts. Each message was scored for mood, dominance, target and social move, and private notes were scored the same way so public and private could be compared. The design leads every view with its finding as a headline sentence, then the chart that proves it. Each agent gets a portrait drawn like an attention map, with traits always in the same place so any two agents compare at a glance. Every chart point opens the real conversation behind it, so no claim floats free of its evidence.